H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-3
Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Toronto second round 6-1 6-7(1) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-7(1) 7-5 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Feb 6, 2005* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2003* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |