H2H data updated: 2026-11-02 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 0-3

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-7(1) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Conchita Martínez #43 6-1 6-7(1) 7-5 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #29 Match data Aug 17, 2005* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #43 6-3 3-6 6-3 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #58 Match data Feb 6, 2005* F Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard
Conchita Martínez #14 7-6(5) 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #126 Match data Oct 9, 2003* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld — #14 1,365 1,856 109 131 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Conchita Martínez — #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,928 0 4
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,062 0 7
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 2007 4–15 21.1% #204 1,521 0 1 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,593 0 1 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 — — — — — — — 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 — — — — — — — 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 — — — — — — — 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 — — — — — — — 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 58 77 135 43.0% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.52
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -74 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.03
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 1991 2077 163.5 — — — — -95 +131 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.07
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 2007 1522 109.9 -1.54 -3.57 0.830 46.3% 0 +226 — 26.2% -1.21 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.7 +0.52 1994 2065 167.6 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 2008 1594 128.7 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -23 +139 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.00 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -102 +201 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 2009 1655 129.0 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -60 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.9 -1.97 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +15 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 2010 1563 104.7 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% -2 +101 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +184 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 2011 1543 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 1998 1968 163.1 — — — — -9 +240 +98 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1898 159.3 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.59
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +230 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1857 131.6 +0.84 -1.46 0.971 49.4% -24 +89 -197 47.1% -0.20 27–38 (42%) 18–26 (41%) 91.9 +0.46 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.