H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Els Callens H2H: 0-1
Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2004 US Open first round 2-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Els Callens | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |