H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 3-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Istanbul fourth round 7-6(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
| May 20, 2005* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-2 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2004* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-0 6-3 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |