H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Fabiola Zuluaga H2H: 1-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Fabiola Zuluaga in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 Australian Open second round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-2 7-6(2) | Fabiola Zuluaga | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Fabiola Zuluaga | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 |