H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 New Haven third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2005* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-1 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |