H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-0

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2005 New Haven round of 32 6-4 6-1.

GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #32 6-4 6-1 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #67 Match data Aug 25, 2005* R32 New Haven Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Jelena Kostanic Tosic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0
22 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,597 0 1 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 58 76 134 43.3% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/230 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 47/190 of Jelena Kostanic Tosic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0% —/—
20 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3% —/—
21 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9% 2003 4/36 0.5 3.0 64.8% 51.0% 50.9% 32.3% 40.3% 50.9% 36.3%
22 2007 16/18 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2% 2004 6/48 0.5 2.5 66.8% 51.0% 50.3% 56.5% 44.0% 50.4% 40.8%
23 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4% 2005 5/32 1.6 3.8 67.1% 63.2% 35.8% 50.5% 43.7% 53.6% 40.1%
24 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2% 2006 8/37 1.5 2.6 67.9% 56.8% 43.5% 51.7% 53.3% 51.9% 38.7%
25 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9% 2007 17/27 1.6 3.1 67.6% 61.5% 44.5% 53.1% 41.7% 56.0% 38.3%
26 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9% 2008 3/6 1.7 2.3 63.3% 62.0% 51.1% 65.9% 10.0% 58.1% 29.2%
28 —/— 2010 4/4 1.0 4.5 64.0% 46.6% 41.6% 36.1% 38.8% 44.8% 36.4%
Career 140/239 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.1% 57.1% 41.7% 47/264 1.3 3.1 66.7% 57.4% 44.8% 50.6% 41.8% 53.1% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Jelena Kostanic Tosic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 103.8 +41 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 +0.18
17 1999 1512 116.4 +24 +37 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +0.26
18 2003 1516 115.9 +21 +1 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) -0.25 2000 1524 108.3 +37 +30 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 +0.25 2001 1560 116.2 +73 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 2002 1571 111.3 -20 +34 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06
22 2007 1528 109.8 -1.58 -3.51 0.830 46.3% +7 +219 25.6% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +0.69 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69
23 2008 1597 128.6 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -17 +136 51.7% +0.03 0–1 -1.01 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09
24 2009 1655 128.8 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -56 +88 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 -1.96 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44
25 2010 1563 104.5 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% 0 +100 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 -0.47
26 2011 1542 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% 0.0% -3.75 -0.26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% +50 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 -0.46
28 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% 0.0% -3.25 -0.15
Career 1857 131.7 +0.84 -1.45 0.971 49.4% -23 +88 -197 47.2% -0.19 27–37 (42%) 17–25 (40%) 92.3 +0.53 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.