H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Julia Schruff H2H: 3-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Montreal second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2006* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-3 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-0 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-2 | Julia Schruff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |