H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-3 | Julia Schruff | Match data | Aug 16, 2006* | R64 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-0 | Julia Schruff | Match data | Mar 8, 2006* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-2 | Julia Schruff | Match data | Mar 24, 2005* | R128 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | — | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 131 | 45.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julia Schruff | — | #52 | 536 | 1,663 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #204 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2003 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 27 | 16 | 43 | 62.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2006 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2004 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 58 | 77 | 135 | 43.0% | 46 | 39 | 85 | 54.1% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | 24 | 38 | 62 | 38.7% | 24 | 36 | 60 | 40.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/231 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 58/128 of Julia Schruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2004 | 3/22 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 58.5% | 65.7% | 58.7% | 42.9% | 40.3% | 62.7% | 48.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 13/62 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 56.2% | 70.4% | 51.6% | 58.5% | 40.0% | 62.2% | 45.3% | 2003 | 1/9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82.0% | 47.6% | 66.7% | 57.1% | 36.4% | 51.0% | 43.8% |
| 21 | 2006 | 40/56 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 58.9% | 65.4% | 45.4% | 57.8% | 44.8% | 57.3% | 42.9% | 2004 | 3/17 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 59.0% | 61.3% | 45.7% | 48.0% | 59.7% | 55.0% | 45.7% |
| 22 | 2007 | 16/19 | 4.6 | 8.0 | 52.4% | 67.4% | 39.9% | 52.8% | 43.4% | 54.0% | 38.2% | 2005 | 6/22 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 58.1% | 62.4% | 41.7% | 49.1% | 41.1% | 53.8% | 40.8% |
| 23 | 2008 | 13/14 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 47.4% | 75.3% | 47.4% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 61.2% | 41.4% | 2006 | 19/42 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 63.1% | 58.9% | 40.7% | 50.4% | 44.7% | 52.3% | 42.4% |
| 24 | 2009 | 39/41 | 3.6 | 5.4 | 58.2% | 64.9% | 46.1% | 54.3% | 54.9% | 56.5% | 41.2% | 2007 | 14/19 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 63.8% | 54.2% | 49.1% | 50.8% | 53.8% | 51.9% | 47.6% |
| 25 | 2010 | 14/15 | 2.8 | 7.0 | 55.0% | 63.7% | 38.6% | 47.6% | 48.2% | 52.7% | 40.9% | 2008 | 9/12 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 61.8% | 54.4% | 37.0% | 51.3% | 44.7% | 47.5% | 46.0% |
| 26 | 2011 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 52.6% | 62.6% | 38.3% | 55.8% | 25.0% | 51.3% | 27.9% | 2009 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 62.1% | 50.2% | 42.1% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 47.2% | 46.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 47.2% | 52.9% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 63.6% | 50.2% | 31.5% |
| Career | — | 140/240 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 56.1% | 66.7% | 45.2% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 57.1% | 41.7% | — | 58/128 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 62.0% | 56.6% | 43.3% | 50.6% | 48.5% | 51.3% | 44.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2003 | 1516 | 115.9 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +1 | — | 38.1% | -0.48 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 1478 | 112.5 | +1.14 | +0.30 | 1.285 | 54.6% | +4 | +58 | — | 34.1% | -0.61 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 1790 | 139.1 | +3.94 | +1.05 | 1.197 | 53.3% | -4 | -165 | -292 | 57.8% | +0.52 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.9 | +1.73 | 2003 | 1508 | 104.6 | -0.91 | +0.18 | 0.894 | 47.6% | — | +36 | — | 45.0% | -0.55 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.22 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1656 | 132.8 | +1.54 | -0.91 | 1.005 | 50.2% | -69 | +191 | -102 | 52.7% | +0.15 | 10–9 (53%) | 6–7 (46%) | 98.7 | +2.20 | 2004 | 1481 | 105.8 | -1.07 | -0.37 | 1.014 | 50.2% | +22 | -10 | — | 36.8% | -0.66 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.6 | +0.61 |
| 22 | 2007 | 1522 | 109.9 | -1.54 | -3.57 | 0.830 | 46.3% | 0 | +226 | — | 26.2% | -1.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–5 (17%) | 93.7 | +0.52 | 2005 | 1565 | 123.7 | -0.34 | -1.39 | 0.882 | 47.3% | -9 | -69 | — | 40.0% | -0.76 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.91 |
| 23 | 2008 | 1594 | 128.7 | +2.89 | -1.21 | 1.066 | 50.8% | -23 | +139 | — | 51.7% | +0.03 | 0–1 | — | — | -1.00 | 2006 | 1503 | 111.2 | -2.40 | -2.02 | 0.888 | 47.4% | +31 | +40 | -7 | 41.7% | -0.83 | 5–1 (83%) | 4–1 (80%) | 108.3 | +1.04 |
| 24 | 2009 | 1655 | 129.0 | +0.58 | -2.14 | 0.947 | 48.9% | -60 | +88 | — | 46.3% | -0.34 | 5–12 (29%) | 4–6 (40%) | 92.9 | -1.97 | 2007 | 1464 | 106.2 | -2.66 | +0.61 | 0.991 | 49.5% | +23 | +55 | — | 41.7% | -0.58 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | 94.5 | +0.19 |
| 25 | 2010 | 1563 | 104.7 | -2.32 | -1.60 | 0.865 | 46.9% | -2 | +101 | — | 37.8% | -1.51 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–0 (100%) | 97.3 | -0.12 | 2008 | 1484 | 104.1 | -4.12 | -0.06 | 0.877 | 47.1% | +10 | +29 | — | 48.0% | -0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.6 | +0.57 |
| 26 | 2011 | 1543 | 96.7 | -0.53 | -1.59 | 0.574 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | -0.26 | 2009 | 1474 | 99.8 | -1.61 | -1.47 | 0.875 | 46.4% | +21 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1452 | 99.1 | -3.11 | -3.04 | 0.632 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 |
| Career | — | 1857 | 131.6 | +0.84 | -1.46 | 0.971 | 49.4% | -24 | +89 | -197 | 47.1% | -0.20 | 27–38 (42%) | 18–26 (41%) | 91.9 | +0.46 | — | 1664 | 112.7 | -2.39 | -0.89 | 0.906 | 47.7% | +18 | +18 | -7 | 40.2% | -0.76 | 16–19 (46%) | 12–10 (55%) | 101.6 | +1.34 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 13, 2009 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 20, 2010 | H2H |
| Virginie Razzano | 4 | 1 | 5 | Aug 12, 2009 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 26, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 29, 2008 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 4, 2007 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 2006 | H2H |
| Emma Laine | 3 | 0 | 3 | Oct 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 16, 2006 | H2H |