H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 2-1

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 2–1 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Istanbul quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #15 6-4 6-4 Karolina Sprem #78 Match data May 27, 2006* QF Istanbul Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #30 7-5 5-7 6-3 Karolina Sprem #85 Match data Sep 15, 2005* R32 Bali Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Karolina Sprem #29 6-4 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #90 Match data May 5, 2004* R64 Berlin Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Karolina Sprem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0
22 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,597 0 1 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Karolina Sprem
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 58 76 134 43.3% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/230 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 82/196 of Karolina Sprem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Karolina Sprem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 —/— 2003 2/20 2.5 6.0 49.5% 62.9% 34.7% 46.4% 27.5% 48.7% 35.2%
19 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0% 2004 7/55 3.0 6.0 53.9% 63.7% 41.1% 57.9% 39.2% 53.4% 40.6%
20 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3% 2005 7/38 1.0 4.9 42.9% 51.0% 42.0% 28.6% 37.0% 46.0% 47.8%
21 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9% 2006 17/28 3.3 5.5 52.7% 63.5% 46.6% 60.8% 57.7% 55.2% 43.4%
22 2007 16/18 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2% 2007 7/9 2.4 6.0 50.3% 65.9% 41.1% 64.4% 45.9% 53.6% 40.1%
23 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4% 2008 12/14 3.9 4.6 54.4% 68.0% 47.0% 58.2% 44.7% 58.6% 45.0%
24 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2% 2009 10/11 3.9 6.2 53.2% 66.7% 44.2% 44.0% 40.1% 56.3% 38.6%
25 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9% 2010 19/20 4.6 4.8 51.2% 70.9% 48.0% 46.1% 35.3% 59.7% 39.9%
26 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9% 2011 1/1 8.0 11.0 54.1% 67.9% 31.1% 66.7% 45.5% 51.0% 42.7%
Career 140/239 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.1% 57.1% 41.7% 82/197 3.5 5.4 51.7% 65.4% 44.9% 52.0% 43.2% 55.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Karolina Sprem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1483 93.8 0.0% -4.50 +0.14
18 2003 1516 115.9 +21 +1 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) -0.25 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% +85 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 +0.25 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32
22 2007 1528 109.8 -1.58 -3.51 0.830 46.3% +7 +219 25.6% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +0.69 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% +130 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37
23 2008 1597 128.6 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -17 +136 51.7% +0.03 0–1 -1.01 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% +63 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54
24 2009 1655 128.8 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -56 +88 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 -1.96 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) -0.09
25 2010 1563 104.5 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% 0 +100 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13
26 2011 1542 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% 0.0% -3.75 -0.26 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.18
Career 1857 131.7 +0.84 -1.45 0.971 49.4% -23 +88 -197 47.2% -0.19 27–37 (42%) 17–25 (40%) 92.3 +0.53 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.