H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Karolina Sprem H2H: 2-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 2–1 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Istanbul quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-4 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2005* | Bali | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| May 5, 2004* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Karolina Sprem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |