H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 0-1
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2009 Luxembourg third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |