H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 2-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Acapulco third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-2 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Kristina Brandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 |