H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 0-1
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2005 Amelia Island second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2005* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |