H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs María Sánchez Lorenzo H2H: 0-1
María Sánchez Lorenzo holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, María Sánchez Lorenzo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, María Sánchez Lorenzo won the 2006 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | María Sánchez Lorenzo | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | #1,067 | #33 | 939 | 1,727 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | María Sánchez Lorenzo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #117 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #72 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #41 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #214 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #111 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #42 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |