H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Zurich third round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2006* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 7-5 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |