H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-1
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 San Diego third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2005* | San Diego | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-1 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Mary Pierce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 |