H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-2

Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Meghann Shaughnessy are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Acapulco quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #22 6-1 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #92 Match data Mar 4, 2006* QF Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #32 6-3 7-5 Meghann Shaughnessy #60 Match data Aug 26, 2005* R16 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #70 7-6(9) 3-6 3-0 (ret.) Anna-Lena Groenefeld #40 Match data Jun 17, 2005* R16 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Meghann Shaughnessy #19 6-3 6-2 Anna-Lena Groenefeld #123 Match data Oct 30, 2003* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #1,012 #14 1,365 1,856 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2007 4–14 22.2% #204 1,527 0 1 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,597 0 1 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 76 134 43.3% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 140/230 of Anna-Lena Groenefeld's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2004 3/22 2.3 3.3 58.5% 65.7% 58.7% 42.9% 40.3% 62.7% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 13/62 3.9 4.3 56.2% 70.4% 51.6% 58.5% 40.0% 62.2% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 40/56 3.2 5.1 58.9% 65.4% 45.4% 57.8% 44.8% 57.3% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 16/18 4.6 8.0 52.4% 67.4% 39.9% 52.8% 43.4% 54.0% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 13/14 5.1 5.3 47.4% 75.3% 47.4% 51.1% 46.9% 61.2% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 39/41 3.6 5.4 58.2% 64.9% 46.1% 54.3% 54.9% 56.5% 41.2% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2010 14/15 2.8 7.0 55.0% 63.7% 38.6% 47.6% 48.2% 52.7% 40.9% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 2011 2/2 1.5 4.0 52.6% 62.6% 38.3% 55.8% 25.0% 51.3% 27.9% 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
Career — 140/239 3.6 5.6 56.1% 66.7% 45.2% 54.3% 47.1% 57.1% 41.7% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 2007 1528 109.8 -1.58 -3.51 0.830 46.3% +7 +219 — 25.6% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +0.69 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 2008 1597 128.6 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -17 +136 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.01 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2009 1655 128.8 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -56 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.8 -1.96 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2010 1563 104.5 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% 0 +100 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 2011 1542 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
Career — 1857 131.7 +0.84 -1.45 0.971 49.4% -23 +88 -197 47.2% -0.19 27–37 (42%) 17–25 (40%) 92.3 +0.53 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.