H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 0-1
Nuria Llagostera Vives holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Llagostera Vives leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nuria Llagostera Vives won the 2010 Palermo third round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2010* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nuria Llagostera Vives | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Nuria Llagostera Vives | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |