H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 0-1
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2005 Canberra fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2005* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |