H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 3-0

Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Charleston Open round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld
GER Age 41 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #15 6-1 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #82 Match data Apr 13, 2006* R32 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #58 4-6 6-2 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #81 Match data Feb 5, 2005* SF Pattaya Open WTA 250 Hard
Anna-Lena Groenefeld #109 7-5 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #73 Match data Mar 9, 2004* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Groenefeld — #14 1,365 1,856 109 131 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Virginia Ruano Pascual — #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2003 3–6 33.3% #118 1,515 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2004 7–15 31.8% #68 1,478 0 0 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2005 36–26 58.1% #21 1,790 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 2006 30–26 53.6% #19 1,656 0 1 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2007 4–15 21.1% #204 1,521 0 1 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #76 1,593 0 1 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 2009 18–23 43.9% #65 1,655 0 1 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2010 4–11 26.7% #166 1,563 0 1 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2011 0–2 0.0% #266 1,542 0 1 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,622 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% — 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2005 27 16 43 62.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 10 16 26 38.5% 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 58 77 135 43.0% 46 39 85 54.1% 3 11 14 21.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Groenefeld Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 2003 1516 115.9 — — — — +21 +1 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.25 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 2004 1478 112.5 +1.14 +0.30 1.285 54.6% +4 +58 — 34.1% -0.61 1–1 0–2 — +0.25 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 +0.39
20 2005 1790 139.1 +3.94 +1.05 1.197 53.3% -4 -165 -292 57.8% +0.52 8–4 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.9 +1.73 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 2006 1656 132.8 +1.54 -0.91 1.005 50.2% -69 +191 -102 52.7% +0.15 10–9 (53%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 +2.20 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) 101.8 +0.72
22 2007 1522 109.9 -1.54 -3.57 0.830 46.3% 0 +226 — 26.2% -1.21 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.7 +0.52 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 2008 1594 128.7 +2.89 -1.21 1.066 50.8% -23 +139 — 51.7% +0.03 0–1 — — -1.00 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.26
24 2009 1655 129.0 +0.58 -2.14 0.947 48.9% -60 +88 — 46.3% -0.34 5–12 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 92.9 -1.97 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -139 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) 105.0 +0.48
25 2010 1563 104.7 -2.32 -1.60 0.865 46.9% -2 +101 — 37.8% -1.51 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) 97.3 -0.12 1999 1661 125.0 — — — — +2 -17 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2011 1543 96.7 -0.53 -1.59 0.574 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.26 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) 92.5 -0.34
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) 95.9 +0.57
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.9 +0.46
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 95.3 -0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% 0 -48 +2 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.3 +0.29
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1623 111.1 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -64 +16 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.7 -0.41
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1622 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1593 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.01
Career — 1857 131.6 +0.84 -1.46 0.971 49.4% -24 +89 -197 47.1% -0.20 27–38 (42%) 18–26 (41%) 91.9 +0.46 — 1819 126.5 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -35 +18 -38 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.