H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 3-0
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 3–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2006 Charleston third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2006* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-4 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2005* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 7-5 6-2 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |