H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Maria Fernandez vs Louise Field H2H: 1-0
Anna Maria Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Maria Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Maria Fernandez won the 1987 San Juan second round 7-6 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 65
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 59
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1987* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Anna Maria Fernandez | 7-6 2-6 7-5 | Louise Field | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Louise Field | #752 | #96 | 12 | 1,579 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Maria Fernandez | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |