H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anna Maria Fernandez vs Maria Lindstrom H2H: 0-1
Maria Lindstrom holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Maria Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Lindstrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Lindstrom won the 1986 Singapore third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 65
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Lindstrom | 6-2 6-3 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Lindstrom | — | — | — | 1,616 | 38 | 66 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Maria Fernandez | Maria Lindstrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,425 | 0 | 1 |