H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Maria Fernandez vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 1-2
Sandra Wasserman holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Maria Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandra Wasserman leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anna Maria Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1988 Auckland second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 65
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 6-1 6-0 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1987* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Anna Maria Fernandez | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 6-4 6-4 | Anna Maria Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Maria Fernandez | — | — | — | 1,717 | 54 | 97 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Maria Fernandez | Sandra Wasserman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |