H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Anna Smashnova vs Marta Marrero H2H: 1-1

Anna Smashnova and Marta Marrero are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on clay, while Marta Marrero leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marta Marrero won the 2001 Libéma Open round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna Smashnova
ISR Age 50 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marta Marrero
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marta Marrero #91 6-3 7-5 Anna Smashnova #73 Match data Jun 21, 2001* R32 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Anna Smashnova #49 6-3 6-1 Marta Marrero #64 Match data Jul 22, 2000* SF Knokke-Heist Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna Smashnova #994 #15 1,616 1,881 242 222 52.2% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Marta Marrero #727 #47 700 1,705 72 100 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna Smashnova Marta Marrero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1991 0–1 0.0% #264 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1992 1–2 33.3% #236 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #139 1,485 0 0 1999 2–2 50.0% #147 1,516 0 0
17 1994 10–11 47.6% #47 1,600 0 0 2000 7–5 58.3% #70 1,599 0 0
18 1995 8–12 40.0% #68 1,577 0 0 2001 20–22 47.6% #61 1,618 0 0
19 1996 4–11 26.7% #132 1,562 0 0 2002 11–23 32.4% #87 1,547 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 7–13 35.0% #98 1,498 0 0
21 1998 12–14 46.2% #49 1,583 0 0 2004 21–21 50.0% #49 1,573 0 0
22 1999 21–23 47.7% #47 1,636 0 1 2005 4–13 23.5% #285 1,499 0 0
23 2000 25–23 52.1% #46 1,669 0 2 — — — — — — —
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #88 1,605 0 2 2007 0–1 0.0% #196 1,482 0 0
25 2002 43–25 63.2% #16 1,794 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 2003 37–21 63.8% #16 1,856 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2004 28–24 53.8% #32 1,709 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2005 24–16 60.0% #43 1,738 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2006 16–16 50.0% #63 1,698 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–3 0.0% #921 1,646 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna Smashnova Marta Marrero
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1995 3 5 8 37.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 12 12 24 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 8 10 18 44.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 10 8 18 55.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2005 1 5 6 16.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 7 11 18 38.9% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 28 14 42 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 12 9 21 57.1% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 12 13 25 48.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 6 12 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 4 7 11 36.4% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 99 197 49.7% 132 81 213 62.0% 6 21 27 22.2% 6 21 27 22.2% — 24 40 64 37.5% 45 50 95 47.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna Smashnova Marta Marrero
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1991 1492 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1992 1489 98.0 — — — — +33 — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1993 1486 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1999 1517 98.9 — — — — — +32 — 40.0% -0.30 2–0 0–1 — +0.04
17 1994 1600 126.0 — — — — +9 -40 — 46.0% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.52 2000 1600 116.9 — — — — — +54 — 51.7% -0.21 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.18
18 1995 1578 118.0 — — — — +7 +20 — 42.9% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +1.76 2001 1618 120.9 — — — — -77 +63 -14 47.9% -0.05 7–7 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 -0.54
19 1996 1562 121.4 — — — — +39 -21 — 32.4% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -1.26 2002 1547 115.3 — — — — +12 +7 +32 38.2% -1.11 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 94.9 -1.19
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1498 108.8 -2.63 -3.77 0.557 39.3% +36 +32 — 40.0% -0.73 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 101.4 +0.54
21 1998 1583 118.4 — — — — -14 +56 — 50.0% -0.14 4–8 (33%) 7–0 (100%) 102.4 +0.55 2004 1573 123.2 -1.84 -1.25 0.828 45.9% -18 +107 -137 50.0% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 107.9 +0.60
22 1999 1636 138.3 — — — — -5 +52 — 48.5% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 99.1 +0.50 2005 1500 103.4 -1.95 -1.09 0.704 42.1% -5 +128 — 27.0% -1.81 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.11
23 2000 1669 125.9 — — — — -101 +130 -144 50.0% +0.02 6–2 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 103.6 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1605 116.1 — — — — -128 +190 — 41.3% -0.43 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 102.2 +0.41 2007 1483 96.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
25 2002 1794 147.7 — — — — -18 +92 — 60.0% +0.67 12–7 (63%) 8–2 (80%) 109.9 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1857 141.4 +0.50 +0.98 1.045 51.1% -69 +127 -365 60.2% +0.59 11–7 (61%) 7–4 (64%) 104.0 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1710 136.5 -2.30 +0.59 0.788 43.9% -59 +259 — 55.7% +0.50 7–3 (70%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1739 136.2 -2.91 +0.20 0.837 45.6% -103 +249 — 59.5% +0.79 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1698 126.6 -3.06 -0.34 0.879 46.7% -96 +184 — 52.2% +0.22 5–6 (45%) — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1646 92.0 +0.35 -1.43 0.805 44.6% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1882 137.9 -2.28 +0.04 0.879 46.8% -46 +137 -242 51.8% +0.13 70–61 (53%) 40–30 (57%) 105.3 +0.96 — 1705 119.0 -2.10 -1.97 0.720 43.1% -15 +67 -37 43.5% -0.56 25–28 (47%) 20–11 (65%) 107.9 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.