H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Smashnova vs Sandra Kloesel H2H: 1-0
Anna Smashnova holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Kloesel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Smashnova won the 2005 US Open first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 6-3 6-3 | Sandra Kloesel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Sandra Kloesel | #1,064 | #87 | 400 | 1,515 | 16 | 54 | 22.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anna Smashnova | Sandra Kloesel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #96 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #164 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |