H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Tatishvili vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-0
Anna Tatishvili holds a 1–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Tatishvili leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Tatishvili won the 2007 Cincinnati third round 1-6 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 42
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna Tatishvili | 1-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Aiko Nakamura | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aiko Nakamura | #730 | #47 | 569 | 1,645 | 50 | 76 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Tatishvili | Aiko Nakamura | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #71 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #57 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #66 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #146 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #677 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |