H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna Tatishvili vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-1
Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2010 Charleston second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Catalina Castano | 7-5 6-2 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Tatishvili | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |