H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anna Tatishvili vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2007 Miami first round 6-3 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 6-3 7-6(2) | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Tatishvili | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |