H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Annabel Croft vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-2
Pam Casale holds a 2–1 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1987 Eastbourne second round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1987* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Pam Casale | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| May 29, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Pam Casale | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1985* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Annabel Croft | 6-3 7-5 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Annabel Croft | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |