H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1

Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1984 Miami Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Medrado #94 6-3 6-2 Annabel Croft Match data Apr 5, 1984* R32 Miami Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,836 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,599 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,647 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,738 0 8
25 — — — — — — — 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,778 0 10
26 — — — — — — — 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,576 0 10
27 — — — — — — — 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,561 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% — 25 49 74 33.8% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +1.01
19 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.02
20 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72 1978 1582 115.6 — — — — +3 -32 — 36.6% -1.05 5–2 (71%) — — -0.14
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1600 122.4 — — — — -32 +22 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.16
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1647 127.0 — — — — — -68 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.78
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1739 134.1 — — — — -124 -50 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.5 +2.58
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1779 140.8 — — — — -197 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 -1.37
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1577 104.0 — — — — -93 +205 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.53
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1588 120.4 — — — — -112 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.36
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1542 114.5 — — — — -92 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.78
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -82 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -107 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.64
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -66 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.44
Career — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 — 1837 128.4 — — — — -99 +60 — 49.5% +0.04 36–57 (39%) 36–29 (55%) 95.0 +2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.