H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Annabel Croft vs Rene Uys H2H: 0-2

Rene Uys holds a 2–0 lead over Annabel Croft in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rene Uys leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rene Uys won the 1984 South African Open quarterfinal 6-4 1-6 7-6.

H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
RSA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rene Uys #95 6-4 1-6 7-6 Annabel Croft Match data May 5, 1984* QF South African Open WTA 250 Hard
Rene Uys #158 7-6 6-4 Annabel Croft Match data Apr 28, 1984* SF Durban WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Annabel Croft 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Rene Uys #61 #39 1,719 47 49 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Annabel Croft Rene Uys
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1981 9–5 64.3% 1,535 0 0 1979 1–1 50.0% 1,505 0 0
15 1982 14–9 60.9% 1,588 0 0 1980 4–1 80.0% 1,573 0 0
16 1983 6–7 46.2% 1,595 0 0 1981 14–6 70.0% 1,682 0 2
17 1984 11–14 44.0% 1,615 0 0
18 1985 23–20 53.5% 1,761 0 1 1983 2–7 22.2% 1,609 0 2
19 1986 10–19 34.5% 1,653 0 1 1984 19–20 48.7% #70 1,635 0 2
20 1987 8–14 36.4% 1,574 0 1 1985 7–14 33.3% #61 1,613 0 2
21 1988 3–3 50.0% 1,562 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Annabel Croft Rene Uys
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1979 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1980 4 1 5 80.0%
16 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
17 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
18 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1984 13 11 24 54.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1988 3 3 6 50.0%
Career 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8% 24 26 50 48.0% 6 11 17 35.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 6 6 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Annabel Croft Rene Uys
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1481 96.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.31
14 1981 1535 118.4 +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 +0.81 1979 1505 104.7 50.0% +0.75 +0.52
15 1982 1589 120.1 +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 +2.10 1980 1573 115.0 +73 75.0% +2.25 1–0 +0.68
16 1983 1595 118.1 -29 +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.87 1981 1683 133.4 -26 68.9% +1.82 2–3 (40%) 0–2 +0.76
17 1984 1615 118.2 -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1985 1762 133.2 +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98 1983 1610 106.2 -30 41.7% -0.29 0–6 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 91.4 +0.26
19 1986 1653 120.6 +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89 1984 1636 116.7 -20 -47 -26 48.4% -0.28 9–8 (53%) 5–7 (42%) 99.8 +0.92
20 1987 1575 108.2 +47 -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97 1985 1614 116.9 -51 -79 +45 36.0% -1.12 4–4 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 104.3 -0.05
21 1988 1562 97.6 +29 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) +0.72
Career 1780 125.1 +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54 1720 123.7 -19 -59 +13 50.0% +0.06 15–21 (42%) 13–15 (46%) 97.2 +3.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.