Anne Hobbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Anne Hobbs holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1984 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Camille Benjamin | Match data | Jun 16, 1984* | QF | Birmingham | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | — | #35 | 18 | 1,834 | 172 | 164 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Camille Benjamin | — | #27 | 13 | 1,821 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Camille Benjamin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,680 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,610 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Camille Benjamin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1982 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1983 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 18 | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 19 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1986 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1987 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1988 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1989 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1990 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1992 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 71 | 50 | 121 | 58.7% | 29 | 42 | 71 | 40.8% | — | 95 | 106 | 201 | 47.3% | 41 | 51 | 92 | 44.6% | 24 | 37 | 61 | 39.3% | 12 | 27 | 39 | 30.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Camille Benjamin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1976 | 1551 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +2.72 | 1982 | 1690 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | -145 | 54.9% | +0.38 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.7 | +0.09 |
| 17 | 1977 | 1574 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | +108 | -76 | — | 44.8% | -0.31 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.73 | 1983 | 1716 | 124.5 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -37 | -117 | 45.0% | -0.65 | 11–8 (58%) | 10–5 (67%) | 107.6 | -1.48 |
| 18 | 1978 | 1720 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | -73 | 59.5% | +0.81 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.9 | +1.71 | 1984 | 1768 | 138.9 | — | — | — | — | -53 | -5 | -97 | 49.6% | +0.05 | 9–10 (47%) | 7–8 (47%) | 100.2 | -4.31 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1750 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -75 | — | -19 | 50.0% | -0.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.4 | -1.78 | 1985 | 1629 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +3 | +11 | 44.6% | -0.60 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 102.2 | +2.67 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1752 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | -133 | -51 | -43 | 56.6% | +0.60 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.9 | -0.11 | 1986 | 1609 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +36 | +19 | 43.4% | -0.36 | 8–8 (50%) | 4–11 (27%) | 96.1 | +1.68 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1825 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -129 | -98 | -24 | 51.6% | +0.07 | 10–5 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.7 | -2.57 | 1987 | 1655 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -9 | +6 | 46.8% | -0.24 | 13–6 (68%) | 3–5 (38%) | 107.2 | -0.10 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1728 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -110 | -94 | +65 | 43.4% | -0.13 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.54 | 1988 | 1601 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +27 | +18 | 41.7% | -0.76 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.5 | +0.03 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1752 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -56 | +25 | 47.7% | -0.24 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.4 | +0.58 | 1989 | 1652 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -23 | -85 | 43.9% | -0.34 | 6–8 (43%) | 1–8 (11%) | 92.9 | -1.46 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1736 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -107 | -51 | +109 | 50.7% | -0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.3 | +0.76 | 1990 | 1620 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | -24 | +20 | -56 | 32.2% | -1.46 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.5 | -1.55 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1778 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | -156 | — | +123 | 51.9% | -0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.21 | 1991 | 1560 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +85 | — | 28.6% | -1.90 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.18 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1680 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -134 | -59 | +222 | 32.6% | -1.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -1.22 | 1992 | 1528 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 23.1% | -2.54 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.34 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1715 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | +118 | 53.6% | +0.21 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.55 | 1993 | 1517 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1503 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1611 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +183 | 30.4% | -1.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–1 | — | +1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1835 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -67 | +52 | 50.1% | +0.01 | 63–54 (54%) | 27–30 (47%) | 100.4 | +1.40 | — | 1822 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +2 | -49 | 44.3% | -0.48 | 70–64 (52%) | 46–54 (46%) | 102.4 | -1.21 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Herr | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 22, 1988 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 18, 1986 | H2H |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 17, 1987 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jan 17, 1990 | H2H |