Anne Hobbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Daniela Marzano holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniela Marzano leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniela Marzano won the 1978 Sydney round of 32 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Marzano | 6-4 7-5 | Anne Hobbs | Match data | Dec 7, 1978* | R32 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,838 | 171 | 163 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,375 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,610 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1968 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1970 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 71 | 50 | 121 | 58.7% | 28 | 41 | 69 | 40.6% | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 22 | 52 | 74 | 29.7% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1976 | 1551 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +2.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 1576 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +110 | -77 | — | 44.8% | -0.31 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 1721 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | -74 | 59.5% | +0.81 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.9 | +1.66 | 1968 | 1429 | 90.9 | — | — | — | — | — | -32 | — | 9.1% | -2.73 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1750 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -72 | — | -19 | 50.0% | -0.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.4 | -1.77 | 1969 | 1376 | 89.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | 23.1% | -2.46 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.42 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1753 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | -138 | -53 | -44 | 57.4% | +0.63 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–5 (38%) | 99.6 | -0.64 | 1970 | 1441 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | 42.9% | -0.66 | 4–3 (57%) | — | — | +1.71 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1824 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -130 | -98 | -23 | 51.6% | +0.07 | 10–5 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.7 | -2.46 | 1971 | 1483 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | -17 | +43 | 41.0% | -0.85 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.46 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1727 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -111 | -94 | +66 | 43.4% | -0.13 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.55 | 1972 | 1456 | 92.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1751 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | -56 | +26 | 47.7% | -0.24 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.4 | +0.51 | 1973 | 1433 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1736 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | -108 | -51 | +108 | 50.7% | -0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.3 | +0.66 | 1974 | 1415 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | -48 | — | 0.0% | -2.83 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.23 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1777 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -156 | — | +124 | 51.9% | -0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.18 | 1975 | 1416 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | — | -43 | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.07 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1680 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -135 | -60 | +222 | 32.6% | -1.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -1.37 | 1976 | 1462 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -41 | +101 | 46.4% | -0.61 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +1.49 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1714 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | +119 | 53.6% | +0.21 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.62 | 1977 | 1474 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | -52 | +69 | 47.1% | -0.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.97 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1556 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -134 | +42 | 48.3% | -0.66 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.4 | +0.46 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1610 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +183 | 30.4% | -1.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–1 | — | +1.08 | 1979 | 1540 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -142 | — | 30.0% | -1.43 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.3 | -0.42 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1553 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | 60.0% | +0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.50 |
| Career | — | 1839 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -67 | +52 | 50.1% | +0.01 | 62–54 (53%) | 27–30 (47%) | 100.0 | +1.22 | — | 1599 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -47 | +59 | 38.7% | -0.97 | 11–24 (31%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.2 | +5.77 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michele Gurdal | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 1, 1978 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 10, 1979 | H2H |
| Corinne Molesworth | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 1, 1977 | H2H |
| Ivanna Madruga | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 8, 1980 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 0 | 2 | 2 | Nov 1, 1979 | H2H |