H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Jo Durie H2H: 5-4

Anne Hobbs holds a 5–4 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1986 Roland Garros round of 128 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main-draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Hobbs #65 6-2 6-4 Jo Durie #21 Match data May 28, 1986* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jo Durie #27 3-6 6-3 6-3 Anne Hobbs Match data Nov 20, 1985* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Anne Hobbs 7-5 6-1 Jo Durie Match data Aug 29, 1985* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jo Durie 6-2 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data Nov 25, 1983* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Anne Hobbs 3-6 6-3 6-3 Jo Durie Match data May 16, 1980* F Lee-On-Solent WTA 250 Clay
Jo Durie 6-4 7-6 Anne Hobbs Match data Apr 20, 1980* F Hampstead WTA 250 Clay
Anne Hobbs 6-1 4-6 6-2 Jo Durie Match data Jun 17, 1978* SF Liverpool WTA 250 —
Jo Durie 1-6 7-5 6-4 Anne Hobbs Match data Feb 4, 1978* R16 Bremen WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Hobbs 7-5 0-1 (ret.) Jo Durie Match data Oct 29, 1976* R16 Torquay WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jo Durie — #5 31 2,102 311 263 54.2% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,602 0 0
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2 1978 15–9 62.5% — 1,618 0 1
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,736 0 4
20 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,842 0 7
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1983 47–18 72.3% #6 2,095 0 9
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,891 0 9
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,800 0 9
25 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,742 0 9
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,703 0 9
28 — — — — — — — 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,673 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,708 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,688 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,563 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,555 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,548 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Jo Durie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1977 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1978 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — 13 6 19 68.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9%
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 12 3 15 80.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8% — 73 75 148 49.3% 57 45 102 55.9% 103 72 175 58.9% 50 65 115 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Jo Durie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1499 100.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1503 107.8 — — — — +73 — +95 54.2% +0.71 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +3.20
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72 1977 1602 121.7 — — — — — -35 +42 56.1% +0.71 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.17
17 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73 1978 1619 121.0 — — — — +14 — -9 57.4% +0.50 5–1 (83%) 1–2 (33%) 104.3 +3.05
18 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71 1979 1713 129.5 — — — — — -74 -93 58.5% +0.36 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 110.0 +0.65
19 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78 1980 1736 123.2 — — — — -179 -11 -58 61.7% +0.60 5–8 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 +0.27
20 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11 1981 1861 136.4 — — — — -158 -78 -117 60.8% +0.60 12–2 (86%) 4–1 (80%) 113.5 -1.05
21 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57 1982 1843 141.3 — — — — -59 -76 -39 55.1% +0.21 8–9 (47%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 -1.90
22 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54 1983 2096 160.0 — — — — -76 -185 -100 69.3% +1.31 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.6 -5.50
23 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58 1984 1892 136.4 — — — — +10 -61 +83 49.3% +0.53 7–4 (64%) 1–5 (17%) 95.2 +0.35
24 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76 1985 1801 133.4 — — — — +15 -49 +121 48.8% +0.06 7–7 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.7 -1.39
25 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 1986 1843 140.1 — — — — +2 -80 +45 55.7% +0.21 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 105.1 -2.77
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22 1987 1742 134.3 — — — — +30 -31 +107 41.0% -0.69 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 96.4 -2.49
27 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55 1988 1703 127.8 — — — — 0 -16 +121 49.4% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 8–4 (67%) 101.9 -0.25
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1622 126.1 — — — — -7 — +202 41.3% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.33
29 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06 1990 1674 130.7 — — — — -60 — +193 51.7% +0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +0.04
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1709 132.3 — — — — +5 -111 +95 45.5% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.02
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1689 130.8 — — — — -48 -50 +163 50.0% -0.09 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 +0.39
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1564 107.8 — — — — -12 — — 35.9% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 92.1 +1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1555 106.0 — — — — — — +191 33.3% -1.42 0–2 — — -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1549 107.6 — — — — — — +141 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
Career — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40 — 2102 141.8 — — — — -26 -68 +43 53.6% +0.27 97–90 (52%) 53–46 (54%) 102.6 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.