H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-2
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1985 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1985* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-3 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1982* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-3 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |