H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-1

Anne Hobbs and Katja Ebbinghaus are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1979 Nice round of 16 6-3 6-1.

GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Hobbs 6-3 6-1 Katja Ebbinghaus Match data Apr 2, 1979* R16 Nice WTA 250 —
Katja Ebbinghaus 6-3 6-4 Anne Hobbs Match data Dec 21, 1978* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Katja Ebbinghaus — — — 1,878 179 146 55.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Katja Ebbinghaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5 1968 4–6 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5 1969 10–9 52.6% — 1,559 0 0
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1970 4–5 44.4% — 1,577 0 0
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,592 0 0
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7 1972 24–12 66.7% — 1,832 0 2
25 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,814 0 2
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8 1974 19–17 52.8% — 1,779 0 3
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1975 19–14 57.6% — 1,838 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1976 10–9 52.6% — 1,765 0 3
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 1977 26–14 65.0% — 1,820 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% — 1,690 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1979 3–4 42.9% — 1,653 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,710 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1981 3–5 37.5% — 1,672 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 1982 3–1 75.0% — 1,679 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1968 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1969 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1970 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1971 — — — — 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1974 0 3 3 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 0 3 100.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8% — 4 11 15 26.7% 132 88 220 60.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 17 32 46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Katja Ebbinghaus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11 1968 1494 106.8 — — — — — -1 — 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) — — -0.04
21 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57 1969 1559 120.0 — — — — +58 -14 — 53.5% +0.37 2–3 (40%) — — +0.60
22 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54 1970 1577 112.4 — — — — — +12 — 42.9% -0.48 2–1 (67%) — — +0.41
23 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58 1971 1593 120.8 — — — — — -4 -15 54.3% +0.37 1–7 (13%) — — +1.77
24 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76 1972 1832 145.6 — — — — -229 +82 -272 65.5% +0.91 5–7 (42%) 0–2 — -2.08
25 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 1973 1815 136.7 — — — — -146 +69 — 54.9% +0.10 4–7 (36%) 2–0 — -2.45
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22 1974 1780 126.8 — — — — -223 +72 -178 56.0% +0.31 3–4 (43%) 6–3 (67%) 99.3 -0.92
27 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55 1975 1839 139.4 — — — — — +59 — 56.0% +0.24 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 103.7 -1.56
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1765 129.1 — — — — — +93 -151 51.2% +0.30 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.11
29 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06 1977 1820 138.1 — — — — -237 +105 -211 60.2% +0.77 9–4 (69%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 +0.73
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1691 126.6 — — — — -134 +162 -113 33.3% -1.17 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.8 -1.89
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1653 108.5 — — — — -65 — — 43.8% -0.63 1–1 1–0 — +1.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1710 128.6 — — — — — +78 — 62.3% +1.20 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +1.31
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1672 108.9 — — — — — +133 — 53.8% +0.69 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +1.11
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1680 106.2 — — — — — +115 — 75.0% +1.50 — — — +0.60
Career — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40 — 1879 138.4 — — — — -150 +67 -146 55.2% +0.35 47–53 (47%) 20–20 (50%) 97.1 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.