H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-2

Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1983 Brighton round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 6-2 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data Oct 20, 1983* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Kim Jones 2-6 6-0 6-1 Anne Hobbs Match data Mar 10, 1983* R32 Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48
23 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57
24 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61
25 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14
27 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69
29 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20
Career — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40 — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.