H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1984 Montreal second round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1984* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |