H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 0-1

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1980 Detroit round of 32 6-2 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-2 2-6 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data Feb 21, 1980* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Lea Antonoplis — #66 6 1,771 129 177 42.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 1978 20–21 48.8% — 1,721 0 0
20 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,726 0 1
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,718 0 2
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,632 0 2
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,568 0 2
25 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,583 0 2
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8 1985 14–21 40.0% — 1,571 0 2
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,459 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,454 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,447 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,431 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8% — 48 73 121 39.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72 1975 1560 116.0 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.22
17 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73 1976 1610 115.7 — — — — +32 -29 -15 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.92
18 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71 1977 1653 115.1 — — — — -4 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.95
19 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78 1978 1722 133.3 — — — — -57 — +32 50.5% +0.05 11–8 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 104.9 +1.83
20 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11 1979 1727 130.8 — — — — -81 — +4 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.1 -0.98
21 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57 1980 1734 123.6 — — — — -96 — +60 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.2 +1.54
22 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54 1981 1719 116.7 — — — — -93 — +93 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.94
23 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58 1982 1633 114.8 — — — — -126 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.4 +1.13
24 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76 1983 1568 97.9 — — — — -31 +19 +128 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.41
25 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 1984 1584 111.1 — — — — -39 — +94 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.44
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22 1985 1571 120.2 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.18
27 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -13 — +165 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1412 91.8 — — — — -5 +47 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.66
29 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -12 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.77
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40 — 1772 122.0 — — — — -33 +2 +75 44.4% -0.47 45–60 (43%) 34–41 (45%) 95.8 +6.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.