Anne Hobbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-11-09 00:00 UTC
Anne Hobbs holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Field in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1985 ASB Classic final 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | 6-3 6-1 | Louise Field | Match data | Dec 15, 1985* | F | ASB Classic | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | — | #35 | 18 | 1,834 | 172 | 164 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Louise Field | — | #96 | 12 | 1,550 | 58 | 121 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Louise Field | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #113 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #100 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #125 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #193 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #170 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,680 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #197 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,610 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Louise Field | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1987 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1988 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1989 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1990 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1991 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1993 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1987 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 71 | 50 | 121 | 58.7% | 29 | 42 | 71 | 40.8% | — | 31 | 61 | 92 | 33.7% | 7 | 26 | 33 | 21.2% | 17 | 24 | 41 | 41.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Louise Field | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1488 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 16 | 1976 | 1551 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +2.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 1574 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | +108 | -76 | — | 44.8% | -0.31 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.73 | 1984 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 18 | 1978 | 1720 | 125.0 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | -73 | 59.5% | +0.81 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.9 | +1.71 | 1985 | 1518 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +108 | 42.9% | -0.86 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1750 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -75 | — | -19 | 50.0% | -0.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.4 | -1.78 | 1986 | 1480 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +34 | — | 26.7% | -1.53 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +1.71 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1752 | 132.6 | — | — | — | — | -133 | -51 | -43 | 56.6% | +0.60 | 8–6 (57%) | 3–5 (38%) | 100.9 | -0.11 | 1987 | 1454 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +35 | +128 | 40.6% | -0.91 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.5 | +2.99 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1825 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -129 | -98 | -24 | 51.6% | +0.07 | 10–5 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.7 | -2.57 | 1988 | 1413 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +56 | +118 | 30.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–3 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.11 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1728 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | -110 | -94 | +65 | 43.4% | -0.13 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.54 | 1989 | 1543 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -110 | +60 | 38.9% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.8 | +0.32 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1752 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -56 | +25 | 47.7% | -0.24 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.4 | +0.58 | 1990 | 1523 | 107.8 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -143 | +110 | 41.9% | -0.52 | 2–8 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +1.49 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1736 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -107 | -51 | +109 | 50.7% | -0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.3 | +0.76 | 1991 | 1436 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -99 | — | 21.6% | -1.87 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–6 (25%) | 94.3 | +0.83 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1778 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | -156 | — | +123 | 51.9% | -0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.21 | 1992 | 1449 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.83 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.8 | +1.27 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1680 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -134 | -59 | +222 | 32.6% | -1.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -1.22 | 1993 | 1471 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 34.3% | -1.49 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.04 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1715 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | +118 | 53.6% | +0.21 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.55 | 1994 | 1477 | 88.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.23 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1611 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +183 | 30.4% | -1.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–1 | — | +1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1835 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -67 | +52 | 50.1% | +0.01 | 63–54 (54%) | 27–30 (47%) | 100.4 | +1.40 | — | 1551 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -13 | +105 | 35.6% | -1.07 | 22–33 (40%) | 19–24 (44%) | 96.1 | +5.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Faber | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 13, 1993 | H2H |
| Isabelle Demongeot | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Andrea Leand | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Eva Pfaff | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 10, 1990 | H2H |