Anne Hobbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1986 Brighton round of 32 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data | Oct 23, 1986* | R32 | Brighton | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data | Jul 4, 1984* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,838 | 171 | 163 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,130 | 464 | 185 | 71.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 19 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,100 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,074 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,101 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,018 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,068 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 1,998 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,067 | 0 | 19 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,610 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1984 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 27 | 5 | 32 | 84.4% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% |
| 18 | 1978 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% |
| 19 | 1979 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% |
| 20 | 1980 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1987 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% |
| 21 | 1981 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1988 | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% |
| 22 | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1989 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 23 | 1983 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1990 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1991 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1993 | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 27 | 1987 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% |
| 29 | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 31 | 50 | 38.0% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 71 | 50 | 121 | 58.7% | 28 | 41 | 69 | 40.6% | — | 145 | 53 | 198 | 73.2% | 156 | 62 | 218 | 71.6% | 38 | 20 | 58 | 65.5% | 125 | 50 | 175 | 71.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1687 | 121.9 | — | — | — | — | -88 | -61 | -1 | 55.2% | +0.14 | 6–2 (75%) | 3–3 (50%) | 105.4 | +1.61 |
| 16 | 1976 | 1551 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.13 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +2.73 | 1983 | 1788 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -118 | 0 | -127 | 57.1% | +0.45 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.8 | -0.81 |
| 17 | 1977 | 1576 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | +110 | -77 | — | 44.8% | -0.31 | 4–1 (80%) | 0–1 | — | +2.78 | 1984 | 2100 | 169.1 | — | — | — | — | -162 | +37 | -327 | 70.4% | +1.55 | 13–7 (65%) | 6–2 (75%) | 112.5 | -2.65 |
| 18 | 1978 | 1721 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | -74 | 59.5% | +0.81 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | 105.9 | +1.66 | 1985 | 2075 | 161.4 | — | — | — | — | -47 | +9 | -202 | 70.6% | +1.90 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–4 (56%) | 99.5 | +0.26 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1750 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -72 | — | -19 | 50.0% | -0.20 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.4 | -1.77 | 1986 | 1992 | 161.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +32 | -50 | 65.7% | +1.31 | 7–12 (37%) | 5–6 (45%) | 90.2 | -2.54 |
| 20 | 1980 | 1753 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | -138 | -53 | -44 | 57.4% | +0.63 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–5 (38%) | 99.6 | -0.64 | 1987 | 2114 | 165.6 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -9 | -171 | 68.6% | +1.51 | 14–8 (64%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.3 | -3.96 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1824 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -130 | -98 | -23 | 51.6% | +0.07 | 10–5 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.7 | -2.46 | 1988 | 2102 | 162.5 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -50 | — | 73.1% | +1.85 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.3 | -1.34 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1727 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -111 | -94 | +66 | 43.4% | -0.13 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | -0.55 | 1989 | 2019 | 154.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +17 | — | 69.0% | +1.48 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.1 | +0.98 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1751 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | -56 | +26 | 47.7% | -0.24 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.4 | +0.51 | 1990 | 2068 | 173.2 | — | — | — | — | +58 | -41 | — | 68.5% | +1.77 | 9–7 (56%) | 3–1 (75%) | 103.3 | -2.84 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1736 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | -108 | -51 | +108 | 50.7% | -0.03 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.3 | +0.66 | 1991 | 2028 | 159.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +26 | — | 72.7% | +1.77 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.7 | +1.33 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1777 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -156 | — | +124 | 51.9% | -0.06 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.18 | 1992 | 1999 | 152.0 | — | — | — | — | +87 | +17 | -90 | 67.0% | +1.41 | 10–3 (77%) | 2–4 (33%) | 101.2 | +2.30 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1680 | 122.2 | — | — | — | — | -135 | -60 | +222 | 32.6% | -1.09 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -1.37 | 1993 | 2046 | 159.7 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -115 | — | 65.8% | +1.04 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.2 | -0.01 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1714 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | -121 | — | +119 | 53.6% | +0.21 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.9 | +1.62 | 1994 | 2067 | 143.1 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 77.4% | +2.36 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–2 | — | +0.52 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1610 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | -110 | — | +183 | 30.4% | -1.52 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–1 | — | +1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1839 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -75 | -67 | +52 | 50.1% | +0.01 | 62–54 (53%) | 27–30 (47%) | 100.0 | +1.22 | — | 2131 | 166.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -4 | -133 | 68.1% | +1.46 | 97–70 (58%) | 48–41 (54%) | 101.4 | -1.10 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jo Durie | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 28, 1986 | H2H |
| Yvonne Vermaak | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 11, 1981 | H2H |
| Susan Leo | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 10, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 2 | 16 | 18 | Nov 12, 1988 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 17 | 17 | Sep 11, 1993 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 3 | 11 | 14 | Feb 5, 1994 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 12 | 1 | 13 | Aug 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 4 | 6 | 10 | Feb 6, 1993 | H2H |