H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1986 Roland Garros round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #50 6-2 6-0 Anne Hobbs #65 Match data Jun 1, 1986* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Mary Joe Fernandez — #4 2,114 2,197 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,897 0 0
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,126 0 2
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6
25 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,880 0 7
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8% — 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1475 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.16
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1554 130.1 — — — — +65 — — 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 — -0.49
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1766 147.4 — — — — -82 -12 -175 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.77
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1897 158.1 — — — — -61 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -4.91
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72 1988 1948 151.1 — — — — -47 -157 -176 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.05
17 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73 1989 1986 162.5 — — — — -24 -108 -156 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -4.16
18 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71 1990 2126 168.4 — — — — +41 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.7 +0.66
19 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78 1991 2063 164.9 — — — — +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78
20 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11 1992 2122 172.0 — — — — +33 -60 -50 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97
21 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57 1993 2059 164.0 — — — — 0 +126 -29 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67
22 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54 1994 1977 147.9 — — — — +8 +147 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06
23 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58 1995 2040 159.3 — — — — +36 -8 -11 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.5 -0.51
24 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76 1996 1936 158.7 — — — — -5 +80 +197 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36
25 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 1997 1990 164.4 — — — — +18 +54 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22 1998 1936 150.6 — — — — +20 — — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.83
27 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55 1999 1902 152.1 — — — — -1 +93 — 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1881 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
29 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40 — 2197 168.6 — — — — +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.