H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 2-0
Anne Hobbs holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1984 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 7-6 1-6 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anne Hobbs | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |