H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Michelle Jaggard Lai H2H: 1-1
Anne Hobbs and Michelle Jaggard Lai are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass, while Michelle Jaggard Lai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 57
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anne Hobbs | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Michelle Jaggard Lai | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1989* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Michelle Jaggard Lai | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | — | — | — | 1,639 | 61 | 105 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Michelle Jaggard Lai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |