H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0
Anne Hobbs holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1980 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1980* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Anne Hobbs | 6-4 6-1 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |