H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anne Hobbs vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-4

Regina Marsikova holds a 4–1 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Regina Marsikova leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1986 Hilton Head round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Regina Marsikova 6-2 6-4 Anne Hobbs #52 Match data Apr 9, 1986* R64 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay
Regina Marsikova 6-3 6-3 Anne Hobbs Match data Aug 20, 1981* R32 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Regina Marsikova 6-3 5-7 9-7 Anne Hobbs Match data Jun 29, 1979* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anne Hobbs 7-5 6-4 Regina Marsikova Match data Dec 15, 1978* R16 Adelaide International WTA 500 Grass
Regina Marsikova 6-3 6-3 Anne Hobbs Match data Nov 25, 1978* QF Christchurch WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,838 171 163 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anne Hobbs Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,575 0 2 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,909 0 8
19 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1980 26–18 59.1% — 1,752 0 5 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,937 0 12
21 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,824 0 5 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,899 0 14
22 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,996 0 15
23 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,750 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,735 0 7 — — — — — — —
25 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8 — — — — — — —
26 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,679 0 8 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,763 0 15
27 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,719 0 15
28 — — — — — — — 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 — — — — — — — 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,540 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anne Hobbs Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 28 41 69 40.6% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anne Hobbs Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.73 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.09
17 1977 1576 107.0 — — — — +110 -77 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.78 1976 1748 142.4 — — — — -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1978 1721 124.8 — — — — -11 — -74 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.66 1977 1909 143.6 — — — — -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24
19 1979 1750 138.1 — — — — -72 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.77 1978 1953 157.8 — — — — -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24
20 1980 1753 133.2 — — — — -138 -53 -44 57.4% +0.63 7–6 (54%) 3–5 (38%) 99.6 -0.64 1979 1937 147.6 — — — — -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91
21 1981 1824 132.2 — — — — -130 -98 -23 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.46 1980 1899 147.5 — — — — -23 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21
22 1982 1727 117.1 — — — — -111 -94 +66 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.55 1981 1997 159.3 — — — — -116 +182 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03
23 1983 1751 128.8 — — — — -65 -56 +26 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1736 125.9 — — — — -108 -51 +108 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1777 133.9 — — — — -156 — +124 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -135 -60 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.37 1985 1764 131.5 — — — — +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30
27 1987 1714 125.8 — — — — -121 — +119 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.62 1986 1720 126.9 — — — — +1 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1672 129.0 — — — — +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1989 1610 99.4 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.08 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +87 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.28
Career — 1839 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 62–54 (53%) 27–30 (47%) 100.0 +1.22 — 2034 150.4 — — — — -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.