H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Hobbs vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 0-2
Stacy Margolin holds a 2–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stacy Margolin leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stacy Margolin won the 1979 Brighton third round 6-2 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1979* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stacy Margolin | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1978* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Stacy Margolin | 6-1 6-2 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Stacy Margolin | — | — | — | 1,855 | 73 | 98 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Hobbs | Stacy Margolin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 16–5 | 76.2% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 4–14 | 22.2% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |