Anne Keothavong
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2012 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2010 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | Iveta Benesova | Match data | Oct 23, 2010* | QF | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 90 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,762 | 178 | 223 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #43 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2011 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2012 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 47 | 80 | 41.2% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 8 | 31 | 39 | 20.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 103 | 116 | 219 | 47.0% | 65 | 79 | 144 | 45.1% | 5 | 18 | 23 | 21.7% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2001 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1476 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1465 | 96.7 | -0.21 | -0.44 | 0.567 | 37.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2002 | 1564 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -100 | — | 47.4% | -0.47 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–2 (67%) | 98.8 | -0.65 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1486 | 100.8 | -1.08 | -0.67 | 0.618 | 39.6% | — | — | -13 | 43.8% | -0.81 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | -0.30 | 2003 | 1479 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +105 | -55 | — | 38.2% | -0.94 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 95.1 | +0.69 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1467 | 93.4 | -2.33 | -1.56 | 0.496 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | — | — | +0.24 | 2004 | 1647 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +14 | — | 53.9% | +0.09 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–4 (50%) | 106.0 | +0.27 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1401 | 89.0 | -3.21 | -4.76 | 0.551 | 37.7% | +51 | — | -4 | 6.7% | -3.53 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 2005 | 1610 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +68 | — | 43.2% | -0.50 | 13–9 (59%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.0 | -0.22 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1425 | 100.9 | -2.40 | +0.38 | 0.930 | 48.4% | +60 | — | -67 | 44.4% | -0.44 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | 2006 | 1592 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +38 | +5 | -151 | 40.9% | -0.93 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.6 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1465 | 118.5 | -1.50 | +0.68 | 0.954 | 48.9% | +49 | — | -108 | 35.7% | -0.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.0 | +0.21 | 2007 | 1521 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | +85 | -42 | — | 34.1% | -1.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.1 | -0.37 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1540 | 114.7 | -0.29 | -0.29 | 0.999 | 50.0% | +25 | +44 | -156 | 46.8% | -0.50 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.8 | +1.51 | 2008 | 1652 | 126.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -18 | — | 50.5% | +0.30 | 9–6 (60%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.8 | -0.69 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1613 | 116.3 | -2.69 | +0.49 | 0.935 | 48.4% | +3 | -16 | -248 | 44.6% | -0.57 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.61 | 2009 | 1647 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +22 | +22 | -131 | 50.9% | +0.18 | 9–1 (90%) | 4–3 (57%) | 109.1 | +1.09 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1618 | 117.6 | +0.58 | +1.18 | 1.022 | 50.6% | +10 | — | — | 51.2% | +0.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.35 | 2010 | 1637 | 121.1 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +1 | — | 44.7% | -0.61 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.03 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1527 | 113.8 | -3.60 | -2.34 | 0.783 | 44.5% | +33 | -4 | -99 | 35.2% | -1.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.2 | -0.95 | 2011 | 1627 | 135.9 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -37 | — | 40.2% | -0.68 | 3–5 (38%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.4 | -2.20 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1481 | 97.1 | -3.69 | -0.76 | 0.696 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.38 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 2012 | 1579 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | +90 | -3 | -125 | 33.9% | -1.08 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.9 | -1.52 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1520 | 96.7 | -2.44 | -2.36 | 0.746 | 44.1% | +94 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.70 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.26 |
| Career | — | 1633 | 113.5 | -1.76 | -0.33 | 0.896 | 47.5% | +25 | +21 | -101 | 39.3% | -0.82 | 14–31 (31%) | 13–12 (52%) | 92.4 | +0.54 | — | 1763 | 127.5 | -2.44 | -2.36 | 0.746 | 44.1% | +22 | -6 | -135 | 44.0% | -0.47 | 71–55 (56%) | 35–44 (44%) | 101.5 | -1.02 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2012 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | 6 | 2 | 8 | May 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Na Li | 0 | 6 | 6 | May 17, 2012 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 30, 2011 | H2H |
| Ana Ivanovic | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 11, 2011 | H2H |
| Flavia Pennetta | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 23, 2011 | H2H |