Anne Keothavong
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2012 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2009 Memphis round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data | Feb 19, 2009* | R32 | Memphis | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 90 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,667 | 98 | 148 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2009 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 47 | 80 | 41.2% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 8 | 31 | 39 | 20.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 62 | 71 | 133 | 46.6% | 32 | 56 | 88 | 36.4% | 4 | 19 | 23 | 17.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's and 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1/2 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 55.0% | 54.5% | 27.8% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 42.5% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1/6 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 57.1% | 50.0% | 38.1% | 44.4% | 25.0% | 44.9% | 34.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 1/4 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 59.1% | 46.2% | 22.2% | 14.3% | 100.0% | 36.4% | 31.6% | 2003 | 3/11 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 66.3% | 64.6% | 48.8% | 70.5% | 43.5% | 59.2% | 39.8% |
| 22 | 2006 | 3/7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 56.9% | 47.1% | 38.4% | 35.5% | 54.5% | 43.8% | 31.0% | 2004 | 6/42 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 64.3% | 55.2% | 46.8% | 52.7% | 53.4% | 51.8% | 45.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 8/8 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 52.9% | 60.9% | 38.8% | 41.8% | 52.7% | 51.0% | 45.5% | 2005 | 3/33 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 66.0% | 47.5% | 32.0% | 53.9% | 44.4% | 42.5% | 38.4% |
| 24 | 2008 | 12/12 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 57.9% | 61.2% | 40.5% | 43.7% | 40.4% | 52.6% | 45.2% | 2006 | 19/45 | 0.8 | 3.7 | 62.8% | 58.0% | 45.5% | 50.8% | 51.1% | 53.2% | 44.0% |
| 25 | 2009 | 24/28 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.1% | 56.9% | 43.0% | 55.3% | 44.6% | 2007 | 19/27 | 0.7 | 5.8 | 60.3% | 56.8% | 40.9% | 46.5% | 50.0% | 50.8% | 44.1% |
| 26 | 2010 | 21/24 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 57.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 44.3% | 48.3% | 52.3% | 44.6% | 2008 | 13/16 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 63.7% | 54.4% | 41.2% | 36.3% | 47.4% | 49.5% | 38.7% |
| 27 | 2011 | 15/17 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 58.8% | 61.8% | 48.1% | 55.3% | 52.1% | 56.4% | 44.6% | 2009 | 17/19 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 61.7% | 54.9% | 39.8% | 40.4% | 51.9% | 49.0% | 45.3% |
| 28 | 2012 | 21/24 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 53.8% | 57.4% | 40.5% | 43.9% | 41.0% | 49.7% | 39.4% | 2010 | 14/17 | 1.0 | 5.9 | 63.1% | 54.9% | 38.3% | 36.0% | 51.1% | 48.7% | 40.7% |
| 29 | 2013 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 56.5% | 47.2% | 45.0% | 45.8% | 35.8% | 46.4% | 37.4% | 2011 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 7.4 | 57.0% | 54.3% | 32.2% | 39.3% | 42.9% | 44.3% | 43.1% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 57.7% | 58.0% | 43.3% | 62.4% | 58.3% | 51.6% | 45.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2/4 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 63.2% | 53.6% | 39.6% | 56.1% | 46.5% | 48.6% | 47.0% |
| Career | — | 111/138 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 59.2% | 43.0% | 47.8% | 45.3% | 52.2% | 42.8% | — | 104/246 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 62.2% | 55.9% | 41.2% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 50.2% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2001 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1476 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1465 | 96.7 | -0.21 | -0.44 | 0.567 | 37.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2001 | 1546 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | 56.0% | +0.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.85 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1486 | 100.8 | -1.08 | -0.67 | 0.618 | 39.6% | — | — | -13 | 43.8% | -0.81 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | -0.30 | 2002 | 1525 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +20 | — | 35.7% | -0.68 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +0.88 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1467 | 93.4 | -2.33 | -1.56 | 0.496 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | — | — | +0.24 | 2003 | 1495 | 108.8 | +1.20 | -0.47 | 0.973 | 50.2% | +30 | -5 | — | 38.5% | -0.62 | 0–4 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | 95.3 | +0.46 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1401 | 89.0 | -3.21 | -4.76 | 0.551 | 37.7% | +51 | — | -4 | 6.7% | -3.53 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 2004 | 1663 | 123.4 | -1.01 | -0.43 | 0.934 | 48.6% | +23 | -138 | -150 | 49.0% | -0.09 | 9–3 (75%) | 3–3 (50%) | 107.2 | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1425 | 100.9 | -2.40 | +0.38 | 0.930 | 48.4% | +60 | — | -67 | 44.4% | -0.44 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | 2005 | 1564 | 109.3 | -3.27 | -1.94 | 0.669 | 41.3% | +36 | -101 | -92 | 36.8% | -0.65 | 4–6 (40%) | 1–6 (14%) | 94.3 | +1.00 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1465 | 118.5 | -1.50 | +0.68 | 0.954 | 48.9% | +49 | — | -108 | 35.7% | -0.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.0 | +0.21 | 2006 | 1611 | 121.4 | -1.81 | -0.26 | 0.940 | 49.0% | +12 | -112 | -120 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.2 | +0.09 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1540 | 114.7 | -0.29 | -0.29 | 0.999 | 50.0% | +25 | +44 | -156 | 46.8% | -0.50 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.8 | +1.51 | 2007 | 1547 | 119.6 | -2.46 | -0.09 | 0.897 | 47.4% | +36 | -41 | — | 39.1% | -0.94 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.9 | -0.88 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1613 | 116.3 | -2.69 | +0.49 | 0.935 | 48.4% | +3 | -16 | -248 | 44.6% | -0.57 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.61 | 2008 | 1513 | 107.2 | -3.15 | -3.06 | 0.768 | 44.3% | +74 | -63 | — | 39.5% | -0.95 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–0 | — | -0.17 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1618 | 117.6 | +0.58 | +1.18 | 1.022 | 50.6% | +10 | — | — | 51.2% | +0.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.35 | 2009 | 1476 | 106.2 | -4.26 | +0.53 | 0.887 | 47.3% | +48 | -10 | -46 | 33.3% | -0.96 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.07 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1527 | 113.8 | -3.60 | -2.34 | 0.783 | 44.5% | +33 | -4 | -99 | 35.2% | -1.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.2 | -0.95 | 2010 | 1496 | 96.3 | -4.40 | -1.63 | 0.794 | 44.8% | +59 | -78 | — | 34.1% | -1.44 | 5–2 (71%) | — | — | +0.60 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1481 | 97.1 | -3.69 | -0.76 | 0.696 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.38 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 2011 | 1492 | 104.5 | -2.78 | -0.88 | 0.774 | 43.8% | — | -65 | — | 27.3% | -2.27 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.65 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1500 | 108.0 | -0.75 | +0.30 | 0.931 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.27 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1520 | 103.4 | -0.44 | -2.36 | 0.915 | 47.9% | — | -33 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1633 | 113.5 | -1.76 | -0.33 | 0.896 | 47.5% | +25 | +21 | -101 | 39.3% | -0.82 | 14–31 (31%) | 13–12 (52%) | 92.4 | +0.54 | — | 1668 | 116.9 | -2.74 | -0.75 | 0.863 | 46.8% | +31 | -52 | -105 | 41.9% | -0.58 | 33–44 (43%) | 18–20 (47%) | 98.0 | +0.68 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2012 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Emilie Loit | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 27, 2008 | H2H |
| Dinara Safina | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 25, 2009 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 25, 2008 | H2H |
| Maria Kirilenko | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 27, 2008 | H2H |