Anne Keothavong
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2012 | H2H |
| Sofia Arvidsson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Marina Erakovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2012 | H2H |
| Sania Mirza | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anne Keothavong vs Naomi Broady H2H: 1-0
Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Broady in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2011 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | 6-2 6-4 | Naomi Broady | Match data | Jun 22, 2011* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Keothavong | #287 | #48 | 1,315 | 1,633 | 48 | 90 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 42 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #180 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #236 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #60 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #121 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2010 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2007 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 2009 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2015 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2010 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2016 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2011 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2012 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 47 | 80 | 41.2% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 8 | 31 | 39 | 20.5% | — | 20 | 22 | 42 | 47.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 18 | 22 | 18.2% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's and 59/66 of Naomi Broady's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1/2 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 55.0% | 54.5% | 27.8% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 42.5% | 32.6% | 2009 | 1/1 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 57.6% | 70.6% | 42.0% | 61.5% | 33.3% | 58.5% | 40.0% |
| 20 | 2004 | 1/6 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 57.1% | 50.0% | 38.1% | 44.4% | 25.0% | 44.9% | 34.0% | 2010 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 56.5% | 74.4% | 33.3% | 50.0% | 28.6% | 56.5% | 35.7% |
| 21 | 2005 | 1/4 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 59.1% | 46.2% | 22.2% | 14.3% | 100.0% | 36.4% | 31.6% | 2011 | 3/3 | 12.7 | 4.3 | 54.0% | 75.3% | 48.4% | 69.0% | 15.8% | 63.3% | 34.5% |
| 22 | 2006 | 3/7 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 56.9% | 47.1% | 38.4% | 35.5% | 54.5% | 43.8% | 31.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 8/8 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 52.9% | 60.9% | 38.8% | 41.8% | 52.7% | 51.0% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 12/12 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 57.9% | 61.2% | 40.5% | 43.7% | 40.4% | 52.6% | 45.2% | 2014 | 4/4 | 9.3 | 4.3 | 56.9% | 70.8% | 43.8% | 46.7% | 42.1% | 59.1% | 29.0% |
| 25 | 2009 | 24/28 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.1% | 56.9% | 43.0% | 55.3% | 44.6% | 2015 | 6/10 | 10.3 | 3.3 | 63.4% | 78.6% | 45.8% | 46.4% | 27.9% | 66.7% | 32.4% |
| 26 | 2010 | 21/24 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 57.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 44.3% | 48.3% | 52.3% | 44.6% | 2016 | 23/26 | 8.4 | 4.8 | 57.9% | 70.2% | 39.9% | 50.5% | 38.0% | 57.4% | 36.1% |
| 27 | 2011 | 15/17 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 58.8% | 61.8% | 48.1% | 55.3% | 52.1% | 56.4% | 44.6% | 2017 | 17/17 | 9.6 | 4.1 | 57.9% | 74.7% | 44.9% | 49.7% | 46.1% | 62.0% | 33.3% |
| 28 | 2012 | 21/24 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 53.8% | 57.4% | 40.5% | 43.9% | 41.0% | 49.7% | 39.4% | 2018 | 4/4 | 12.5 | 3.5 | 58.4% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 64.0% | 10.0% | 58.8% | 30.1% |
| 29 | 2013 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 56.5% | 47.2% | 45.0% | 45.8% | 35.8% | 46.4% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 111/138 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 56.8% | 59.2% | 43.0% | 47.8% | 45.3% | 52.2% | 42.8% | — | 59/67 | 9.6 | 4.2 | 58.2% | 72.3% | 43.3% | 51.6% | 36.3% | 60.2% | 34.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Anne Keothavong | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2001 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1476 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 1465 | 96.7 | -0.21 | -0.44 | 0.567 | 37.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2009 | 1485 | 100.3 | -1.38 | -3.59 | 0.963 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1486 | 100.8 | -1.08 | -0.67 | 0.618 | 39.6% | — | — | -13 | 43.8% | -0.81 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | -0.30 | 2010 | 1470 | 99.4 | -5.23 | -2.65 | 0.821 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.06 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1467 | 93.4 | -2.33 | -1.56 | 0.496 | 34.1% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.88 | — | — | — | +0.24 | 2011 | 1473 | 95.0 | +1.81 | -0.83 | 0.939 | 48.5% | — | — | +46 | 37.5% | -0.62 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1401 | 89.0 | -3.21 | -4.76 | 0.551 | 37.7% | +51 | — | -4 | 6.7% | -3.53 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 2012 | 1463 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1425 | 100.9 | -2.40 | +0.38 | 0.930 | 48.4% | +60 | — | -67 | 44.4% | -0.44 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 1465 | 118.5 | -1.50 | +0.68 | 0.954 | 48.9% | +49 | — | -108 | 35.7% | -0.57 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.0 | +0.21 | 2014 | 1460 | 101.3 | -0.21 | -3.52 | 0.709 | 45.2% | — | — | +50 | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1540 | 114.7 | -0.29 | -0.29 | 0.999 | 50.0% | +25 | +44 | -156 | 46.8% | -0.50 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.8 | +1.51 | 2015 | 1511 | 105.2 | +3.12 | -3.00 | 0.975 | 48.6% | +44 | — | -16 | 47.8% | -0.13 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.2 | +0.53 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1613 | 116.3 | -2.69 | +0.49 | 0.935 | 48.4% | +3 | -16 | -248 | 44.6% | -0.57 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.61 | 2016 | 1495 | 109.2 | +0.76 | -4.87 | 0.847 | 47.1% | +47 | — | -85 | 41.0% | -0.85 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.2 | -0.37 |
| 27 | 2011 | 1618 | 117.6 | +0.58 | +1.18 | 1.022 | 50.6% | +10 | — | — | 51.2% | +0.15 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +0.35 | 2017 | 1551 | 114.6 | +2.49 | -5.32 | 0.876 | 47.9% | +6 | — | -166 | 42.9% | -0.71 | 2–6 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.1 | -0.22 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1527 | 113.8 | -3.60 | -2.34 | 0.783 | 44.5% | +33 | -4 | -99 | 35.2% | -1.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.2 | -0.95 | 2018 | 1485 | 104.1 | +0.54 | -1.89 | 0.732 | 44.6% | +4 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.40 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1481 | 97.1 | -3.69 | -0.76 | 0.696 | 42.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.38 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 2019 | 1445 | 88.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1434 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1633 | 113.5 | -1.76 | -0.33 | 0.896 | 47.5% | +25 | +21 | -101 | 39.3% | -0.82 | 14–31 (31%) | 13–12 (52%) | 92.4 | +0.54 | — | 1604 | 108.0 | +1.33 | -4.25 | 0.854 | 47.3% | +30 | — | -43 | 39.8% | -0.76 | 13–16 (45%) | 11–13 (46%) | 99.4 | -0.26 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Naomi Broady
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Timea Babos | 1 | 3 | 4 | Apr 6, 2018 | H2H |
| Monica Puig | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 20, 2017 | H2H |
| Sabine Lisicki | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 19, 2017 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 13, 2017 | H2H |
| Daria Saville | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 18, 2017 | H2H |