H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Anne Kremer vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 0-1
Iveta Benesova holds a 1–0 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iveta Benesova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2005 Prague fourth round 5-7 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 50
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2005* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Iveta Benesova | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Anne Kremer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Kremer | #1,039 | #18 | 1,265 | 1,810 | 147 | 182 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Kremer | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #31 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #33 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #401 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2004 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #165 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #82 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #265 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #331 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #238 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |