H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anne Smith vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 3-0
Anne Smith holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1983 Chicago third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 66
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-4 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Nov 27, 1981* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Anne Smith | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1981* | Perth 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-3 | Anne Hobbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anne Hobbs | #583 | #35 | 18 | 1,842 | 174 | 164 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Anne Hobbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 22–18 | 55.0% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,736 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,777 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,609 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |