H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anne Smith vs Jennifer Mundel H2H: 1-0
Anne Smith holds a 1–0 lead over Jennifer Mundel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1986 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Anne Smith | 6-1 6-3 | Jennifer Mundel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jennifer Mundel | #321 | #78 | 7 | 1,748 | 79 | 107 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anne Smith | Jennifer Mundel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 13–13 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 16–24 | 40.0% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #78 | 1,575 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #161 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |